ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
A surface morphology-based inference method for the cell wall elasticity profile in tip-growing cells.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant development and adaptation are highly dependent on cell morphology and growth. High turgor pressure in plants causes stress on the cell wall, followed by cell extension. In tip-growing cells, the localization of vesicles and cytoskeleton components has been well studied. However, there has been a lack of attention to the spatial profile of mechanical properties, specifically the cell wall elasticity. In this study, we introduce a new surface morphology-based method to measure the elasticity of the cell wall in tip-growing cells. Previous work is based on measurements from the wall meridional outline, a technique that cannot track the elastic deformation of the cell wall experimentally. Instead, we developed a way to infer the bulk modulus distribution from the cell surface by triangulating experimental marker points coming from fluorescent labeling. To justify the use of our protocol in tip-growing cells from the moss Physcomitrium patens, we replicated the experimental noise and moss morphology in simulated cells. In practice, we found that a larger triangulation improved robustness against noise, which agreed with our theoretical study. With multiple cell sampling, we determined that 10 cells were sufficient to recover the elasticity distribution with noise, but only when the elastic stretches were high enough. We then created a dimensionless map of inference error to verify a spatial change of P. patens bulk modulus within two folds. This technique will open the field to more comprehensive measurements of cell wall elasticity, providing a key step in understanding tip cell growth and morphogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.