ArticlePloS one2026
Where extended reality and AI may take us: Ethical issues of impersonation and AI fakes in social virtual reality.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We describe a study based on a panel discussion that took place in social virtual reality (VR) at the conference IEEE VR 2025. Each panellist was embodied in a virtual body that looked like themselves. The VR scene was projected onto a screen in front of the audience in the main conference theatre. During the course of the panel two of the panellists swapped avatars, but tried to act as if they were the other person. Additionally, a large language model-controlled Alan Turing (AT) avatar participated. The study aimed to assess the audience's ability to detect the human identity swap and their perception of the AT panellist. We found that about 40 of 100 attendees who answered a post panel survey did not notice the body swap, highlighting a form of change blindness towards social identity in VR. While AT was seen as less realistic and somewhat distracting, its inclusion demonstrated the increasing capabilities of AI in natural language processing and interaction. The paper emphasises the critical need for ethical considerations, such as identity verification and guidelines for representing historical figures, as virtual reality platforms that can represent historical figures in combination with LLMs become more widespread.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.