Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41926435›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Anticipated discrimination in daily life: Predictors, stress appraisals, and responses.

Lydia Q Ong, Megan W Wolk, Anthony L Burrow, Monika Lohani, Patrick L Hill, Nancy L Sin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lydia Q OngDepartment of Psychology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3035-6350
Megan W WolkDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Anthony L BurrowDepartment of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Monika LohaniDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
Patrick L HillDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Nancy L SinDepartment of Psychology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2519-7797

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A large body of literature details the deleterious effects of everyday discrimination on health, focusing on stress processes after discrimination occurs. In contrast, less work has investigated what occurs prior to encountering discrimination when a person expects it. Using a 10-day daily diary design, the current study examined predictors and outcomes of anticipated discrimination. Participants included 341 U.S. adults aged 19-74 years (29% racial minorities, 68% women). Multiple regression examined predictors of anticipated and reported discrimination. Further, two-level multilevel models evaluated anticipated discrimination predicting discrimination occurrence, appraisals, affect, and physical symptoms. Results showed that discrimination was anticipated on 21% of days; racial minorities and people with more prior exposure to discrimination anticipated more daily discrimination than White participants and those with lower prior exposure. People who anticipated discrimination more often than others reported more daily discrimination and perceived discrimination as more stressful but also perceived greater control over the events. They additionally had relatively larger upticks in physical symptoms on days when discrimination occurred-but no differences in discrimination-related affect-compared to people who anticipated discrimination less frequently. Within-persons, anticipating discrimination on a given day (versus not) was associated with greater likelihood of reporting discrimination occurred later that day and greater perceived stress severity, but no differences in perceived control, affect, or physical symptoms. In sum, anticipated discrimination was fairly common in daily life, and individual differences in anticipated discrimination were linked to more perceived daily discrimination, higher perceived stress severity, and more discrimination-related physical symptoms.

Indexed as

Stress, PsychologicalAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSubjective Stress

Identifiers

PMID41926435
PMCPMC13046157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.