ArticlePloS one2026
Effect of partner support on antenatal care visits among married adolescents in rural northwestern Uganda: A quasi-experimental study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdolescent pregnancy is associated with several challenges, and partner support is crucial. However, the causal effect of partner support on the use of maternal health services among pregnant adolescents has not been rigorously examined. We assessed the causal effect of partner support on the frequency of antenatal care (ANC) visits among married adolescents in rural Uganda.
methodsWe conducted a quasi-experimental study using observational data from a cross-sectional study that involved married adolescents aged 10-19 years in rural northwestern Uganda. The primary exposure was partner support, measured as a binary variable. Adolescents were considered to have received support if their spouse encouraged ANC attendance, accompanied them to visits, or provided financial or emotional support during ANC; otherwise, they were classified as having not received support. The primary outcome was the number of ANC visits, while the secondary outcome was attending four or more ANC visits. Propensity score weighting was used to ensure covariate comparability between the partner support groups (yes vs. no). Poisson regression was used to estimate the causal effect of partner support on the number of antenatal care (ANC) visits (primary outcome), while the modified Poisson regression was used to estimate the causal effect on attending four or more visits (secondary outcome).
resultsOf 281 participants, 205 (72.9%) received partner support. Among participants with partner support compared to those without partner support, the frequency of ANC visits (Risk Ratio 1.15, 95% CI: 1.00-1.32) and four or more ANC visits (Risk Ratio 1.25, 95% CI: 1.01-1.52) improved.
conclusionThe study showed that partner support was associated with improvements in ANC visit frequency and attendance of four or more ANC visits, among married adolescents in northwestern Uganda. Interventions aimed at improving ANC utilization should consider engaging and educating partners, as their support positively influences ANC utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.