ArticlePloS one2026
Feasibility and agreement between TTE and intracavitary ECG for PICC tip positioning in adult oncology patients: A single-centre exploratory study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundECG-guided tip localization of central venous access has been clinically proven to be highly accurate and safe. However, real-time tip localization in patients with atrial fibrillation remains a challenge. Transthoracic ultrasound catheter tip localization is noninvasive and real-time. However, no methodological or accuracy studies of its localization have been reported in the literature.
objectiveTo explore the accuracy of the TTE technique in localizing the tip position of central venous access devices (CVADs) and to establish a standardized TTE-guided catheter tip positioning procedure.
methodsThis was an self-controlled trial. A total of 35 patients requiring PORT or PICC implantation participated in this study from April 2023 to March 2024. First, catheter positioning was performed under TTE guidance, and after determining the position of the catheter tip, the insertion depth and relative data were recorded. Subsequently, ECG-guided positioning was performed. The final position of the catheter was standardized by ECG.
resultsA total of 35 patients successfully underwent CVAD insertion under the guidance of IC-ECG. Five patients were excluded from the per-protocol (PP) analysis because the catheter tip could not be visualized in the Apical Four Chamber View. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between ECG-measured depth and TTE-measured depth (t = -1.405, p = 0.17). In the PP Bland-Altman analysis, the mean bias was -0.13 with 95% limits of agreement (LOA) from -1.10 to 0.83, indicating good agreement between the two methods. An additional intention-to-diagnose (ITD) analysis with extreme value imputation for the five missing cases yielded a mean bias of -0.34 and 95% LOA from -1.70 to 1.00, further confirming the robustness of the findings. The pain intensity score did not exceed 4 points for 34 patients, with only one patient reaching 5 points. The TTE operation time did not exceed 8 minutes for each patient.
conclusionThis study suggests that non-contrast TTE shows reasonable consistency with IC-ECG, with short operation time and acceptable patient discomfort. TTE may serve as a feasible, real-time, non-invasive alternative for patients in whom IC-ECG cannot be used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.