ArticlePloS one2026
In transit: Cross-cultural differences in international students' constructively aligned learning experience.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Constructive alignment is widely promoted as a culturally neutral framework for outcome-based higher education, yet most evidence for its benefits comes from Western settings and focuses on positive outcomes. This study examined whether international students' home learning culture moderates the associations between perceived constructive alignment and learning motivation, cognitive load, and academic stress. In a three-wave survey, 129 first-year international students at an English‑medium university in Germany reported on one constructively aligned class across a semester. At T1, they rated the clarity of learning outcomes, alignment of teaching activities and assessments, and feedback effectiveness. Motivation (competence self-perception, enjoyment, usefulness) and cognitive load (intrinsic and extraneous) were rated at T2, and academic stress (workload- and expectations-related) at T3. Moderated linear regression analyses showed that higher perceived alignment was linked to stronger motivation in European students, but these benefits were attenuated in students from instructor‑centred traditions: the competence benefit was weaker for Gulf Cooperation Council students, and the enjoyment and usefulness benefits were weaker for Confucian Heritage students. Perceived alignment robustly predicted lower extraneous cognitive load across all groups, with no reliable cultural moderation. In contrast, alignment was associated with lower expectations-related stress in European students but with higher workload- and expectations-related stress in Confucian Heritage and Gulf Cooperation Council students. These findings suggest that constructive alignment is not culturally neutral: for students from instructor‑centred learning cultures, the same design features that support motivation can simultaneously heighten stress, underscoring the need for culturally responsive implementation in internationalised higher education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.