ReviewBulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013)2026
Endoscopic spine surgery.
Review in Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractEndoscopic spine surgery (ESS) has emerged as a transformative approach in the treatment of spine pathology, offering advantages over traditional open surgical techniques. This review examines the historical development of ESS, highlighting key figures and milestones that have shaped its evolution. It explores different endoscopic techniques, including transforaminal, interlaminar, lumbar fusion, cervical, and thoracic approaches. The review also provides an overview of the ongoing debate between uniportal and biportal ESS, discussing the relative invasiveness, capabilities, costs, and learning curves. In addition, it examines the complication profiles of ESS compared with open surgery as well as the economic implications of these techniques. Finally, the review outlines future directions for ESS and the impact of enabling technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.