Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41926156›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2026

Gender and Racial Discrimination During Residency Training: Scoping Review.

Ida John, Liz Dennett, Julie Nguyen, Marghalara Rashid

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ida JohnDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 3-591 Dianne and Irving Kipnes Health Research Academy, 11405 87 Avenue NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada, 1 780 248 5582.ORCID 0009-0006-0279-1557
Liz DennettGeoffrey and Robyn Sperber Health Sciences Library, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0758-5411
Julie NguyenDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 3-591 Dianne and Irving Kipnes Health Research Academy, 11405 87 Avenue NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada, 1 780 248 5582.ORCID 0000-0001-7722-3702
Marghalara RashidDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 3-591 Dianne and Irving Kipnes Health Research Academy, 11405 87 Avenue NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada, 1 780 248 5582.ORCID 0000-0001-5503-752X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Women and visible minorities (VMs) continue to face discrimination while working in health care. These instances of discrimination can range from those perpetrated by individuals, such as misidentification, to prejudices held by institutions, such as a lack of commitment to hiring VMs. Furthermore, many residents face unique experiences of discrimination due to the intersection of gender and race. Although numerous studies have been published on the experiences of physicians with discrimination, there is a limited literature specifically on the experiences of residents. Objective: This study aimed to explore and analyze the impact of gender and racial discrimination on medical residents during their residency training. Methods: This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. A health sciences librarian searched 5 databases: Ovid Medline(R) ALL, Embase (via Ovid), APA PsycInfo (via Ovid), CINAHL Plus with Full Text (via EBSCOhost), and Scopus. No study design, country, or date restrictions were applied. Studies that explored the impact of both gender and racial discrimination on residents during their residency training were included. Two reviewers conducted title and abstract screening, followed by full-text screening, and any discrepancies were resolved through group consensus. This study's content was extracted using Microsoft Word to create tables for organizing and managing the information from the included studies. Results: After removing duplicates, the literature search revealed 2435 papers for title and abstract screening. A total of 340 papers were selected for full-text review, and ultimately, 26 papers met the inclusion criteria. Included papers were published between 1995 and 2024 in the United States (n=16), Canada (n=4), Australia and New Zealand (n=2), Saudi Arabia (n=1), Mexico (n=1), South Africa (n=1), and the United Kingdom (n=1). Our analysis revealed four themes: (1) forms of discrimination faced by VMs, (2) sources of discrimination, (3) ramifications of discrimination, and (4) ways for individuals and institutions to reduce gender and racial discrimination. Conclusions: This scoping review identified that discrimination primarily manifests as microaggressions against residents and revealed the negative impact it continues to have on their careers. Raising awareness about these issues can help programs and institutions develop tailored solutions to tackle these problems and provide a safe, inclusive training environment for all residents.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyRacismSexismFemaleHumansMalediscriminationgenderracialresidentsscoping review

Identifiers

PMID41926156
PMCPMC13045779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.