Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41926132›Full record

ArticleThe ultrasound journal2026

The role of paediatric point-of-care ultrasound in Spain: Present status and future perspectives.

Luis Ortiz-González, Luis Ortiz-Peces, Carlos Ortiz-Peces

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ultrasound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luis Ortiz-GonzálezDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain.
Luis Ortiz-PecesDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, La Paz University Hospital. Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0009-0002-6449-3564
Carlos Ortiz-PecesDr. Luis Ortiz González Paediatric Clinic, Badajoz, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe use of ultrasound by physicians not specialized in diagnostic radiology, as an adjunct to physical examination, has been termed "point-of-care ultrasound". In the last decade, this technique has been implemented in various medical fields, particularly family medicine and in emergency and urgent care. METHODOLOGY: A descriptive, cross-sectional observational study was conducted, involving a survey of physicians (mostly pediatricians) who had attended a training course in pediatric point-of-care ultrasound organized by different scientific societies. The aim was to obtain feedback from the pediatricians on the use, usefulness, barriers and training in ultrasound.

resultsA total of 126 physicians were interviewed, most of whom declared having access to ultrasound. However, less than half of them made use of such devices, due to considerable difficulties, including lack of time and training. A total of 96.8% of those surveyed considered that ultrasound should be part of the training protocol of physicians specializing in pediatrics. The vast majority believed ultrasound training to be very important but considered their level of experience with the technique to be basic. DISCUSSION: The implementation of point-of-care ultrasound in pediatrics is still limited in Spain, though the professionals agree on highlighting its relevance in daily practice. Among the most prominent benefits are resource optimization and shortening of the time to diagnosis. The participants agree that competence in the technique should be incorporated in a structured manner to the training of physicians specializing in pediatrics.

Identifiers

PMID41926132
PMCPMC13320565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.