Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41926120›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Match Rates Between Home Health Assessment and Medicare Claims Data.

Momotazur Rahman, Xiao Joyce Wang, Jamie M Smith, Christopher M Santostefano, Jeffrey Hiris, Jianhui Xu, Elizabeth M White, Katherine A Ornstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Momotazur RahmanDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Xiao Joyce WangDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Jamie M SmithDwyer School of Nursing, Widener University, Chester, Pennsylvania.
Christopher M SantostefanoDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Jeffrey HirisDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Jianhui XuDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Elizabeth M WhiteDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Katherine A OrnsteinJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, School of Medicine, Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) is essential for measuring home health quality and outcomes, and accurate linkage between OASIS, Medicare enrollment, and claims is crucial for monitoring utilization and informing payment policy. Preliminary documentation suggested a decrease in OASIS-beneficiary match rates beginning in 2019, but the extent and implications of this decrease have not been quantified. Objective: To quantify annual match rates between OASIS assessments and Medicare enrollment and fee-for-service (FFS) home health claims from 2017 through 2023. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used 100% OASIS assessments from 2017-2023 linked to the Master Beneficiary Summary File (MBSF) and FFS home health claims. OASIS assessments included patients receiving home health care in any payer category, while claims analyses were restricted to FFS beneficiaries. Data were analyzed from June 2025 to January 2026. Main Outcomes and Measures: The yearly number and proportion of OASIS assessments that can be matched to a person in the MBSF and the yearly number and proportion of FFS home health claims that can be matched to an OASIS assessment. Results: Across 2017-2023, approximately 18 million OASIS assessments and 6 million unique assessed beneficiaries were recorded annually. The proportion of assessments linked to a Medicare beneficiary decreased from 89.8% in 2017 to 76.4% in 2023. Among unmatched assessments, the share with Medicare as the recorded payer increased, while the share with Medicaid decreased. For FFS beneficiaries, the number of claims increased due to payment cycle changes, yet the number of unique FFS claimants decreased from 3 424 394 in 2017 to 2 636 931 in 2023. The match rate of FFS claims to an OASIS assessment decreased from 96.8% to 73.9%, with variation across states; by 2023, all state match rates were below 90%. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest a reduced ability to accurately attribute OASIS assessments to individual Medicare beneficiaries or matching claims to corresponding OASIS assessments using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Research Identifiable Files. Until these issues are addressed by CMS, researchers should cautiously interpret findings utilizing individually linked Medicare claims and OASIS assessment data.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesInsurance Claim ReviewMedicareOutcome Assessment, Health CareAgedCohort StudiesFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHumansMaleUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41926120
PMCPMC13047462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.