ReviewFEMS microbiology reviews2026
Protein-protein interfaces in chemotaxis receptor complexes and their role in signaling.
Review in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chemotaxis receptor complexes sense chemical gradient in the cellular environment to direct swimming towards favorable environments. The core signaling units of these complexes are made up of two trimers-of-dimers of chemoreceptors, two CheW and a CheA dimer, which further assemble into large hexagonal signaling arrays. Structural and biochemical studies have provided important information on the architecture and interfaces of these complexes. However, the signaling pathway of these complexes that controls the kinase is not fully understood. In this review, we highlight the highest resolution models of this system and examine the current consensus on the protein-protein interfaces based on models and interface experiments. We also highlight differences observed between signaling states for the individual proteins and the protein interfaces that are proposed to be part of the signaling mechanism. Overall, we conclude that there is strong structural consensus for the protein interfaces but, despite some intriguing results, more information is needed to understand how the interfaces change between signaling states and the role they play in signaling. An animated Interactive 3D Complement (I3DC) is available in Proteopedia at https://proteopedia.org/w/Journal:FEMS_Microbiology_Reviews:1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.