ArticleMultidisciplinary respiratory medicine2026
Paradigm shift in medicine and in clinical reasoning method: time has come for a new chest semiotics.
Article in Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Semiotics and clinical reasoning: Thoracic ultrasound as an epistemic mediator.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionClinical reasoning in medicine is a complex cognitive process that integrates sensory perception, interpretation, and abductive inference to develop diagnostic hypotheses. Despite the rise of artificial intelligence, the patient-clinician encounter remains rooted in semiotics and a probabilistic approach driven by Bayesian updating. In this context, medical knowledge is viewed as context-dependent and subject to continuous revision based on new clinical signs. MAIN BODY: This paper identifies bedside ultrasonography as a transformative "epistemic mediator" that enhances traditional semiotics by uncovering subtle clinical signs often missed by conventional inspection, palpation, percussion, and auscultation. In managing respiratory diseases, ultrasound provides direct, contextualized data that refines the interpretation of findings such as dullness, altered fremitus, and crackles by linking them to specific anatomical correlates. Based on these principles, the AdET-CHEPHEUS initiative proposes a new paradigm for chest physical examination centered on three pillars: 1) Visual inspection; 2) Auscultation integrated with ultrasound; 3) Palpatory ultrasound evaluation Conclusion: By replacing traditional percussion with more informative and reproducible ultrasound-based methods, this model aligns modern technology with classical clinical epistemology. The integration of ultrasound into bedside reasoning represents a vital evolution in chest semiotics, preserving the human element of the diagnostic process while increasing accuracy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.