Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41926061›Full record

ArticleAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2026

Counterion-Controlled Photocatalytic Doping of Organic Semiconductors.

Tiefeng Liu, Zesheng Liu, Ihor Sahalianov, Qiao He, Sang Young Jeong, Huotian Zhang, Qifan Li, Chi-Yuan Yang, Junpeng Ji, Lize Bynens and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Tiefeng LiuLaboratory of Organic Electronics, Department of Science and Technology, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.
Zesheng LiuLaboratory of Organic Electronics, Department of Science and Technology, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.
Ihor SahalianovLaboratory of Organic Electronics, Department of Science and Technology, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.
Qiao HeCollege of Education Sciences, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), Guangzhou, China.
Sang Young JeongDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Huotian ZhangElectronic and Photonic Materials, Department of Physics, Chemistry, and Biology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Qifan LiLaboratory of Organic Electronics, Department of Science and Technology, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.
Chi-Yuan YangLaboratory of Organic Electronics, Department of Science and Technology, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.
Junpeng JiLaboratory of Organic Electronics, Department of Science and Technology, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.
Lize BynensInstitute for Materials Research (IUMAT), Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Wouter MaesInstitute for Materials Research (IUMAT), Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Feng GaoElectronic and Photonic Materials, Department of Physics, Chemistry, and Biology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Han Young WooDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Martin HeeneyPhysical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6879-5020
Glib BaryshnikovLaboratory of Organic Electronics, Department of Science and Technology, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0716-3385
Mats FahlmanLaboratory of Organic Electronics, Department of Science and Technology, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.
Simone FabianoLaboratory of Organic Electronics, Department of Science and Technology, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7016-6514

Funding

European Union 101077649FWO Vlaanderen 1S70122NFWO Vlaanderen G025922NKnut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation 2021.0058Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation 2022.0034Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation 2023.0464National Academic Infrastructure for Supercomputing in Sweden liu-compute-2024-14National Academic Infrastructure for Supercomputing in Sweden naiss2025-5-140National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2025-24683763Swedish government's Strategic Research Area in Materials Science on Functional Materials at Linköping University SFO-Mat-LiU 2009-00971Swedish Research Council 2020-03243Swedish Research Council 2022-04053Swedish Research Council 2022-04553Swedish Research Council 2022-06725Swedish Research Council 2024-05286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photocatalytic doping is a versatile and potentially sustainable strategy to control charge accumulation and transport in organic semiconductors (OSCs). In this process, light-activated photocatalysts (PCs) act as electron shuttles, oxidizing or reducing OSCs under mild conditions, while redox-inert salts supply counterions to stabilize the resulting charges. Although the energetics of PC/OSC systems are well studied, the influence of counterions has not yet been systematically examined. Here, we show that counterion size and interaction with the PC critically govern photocatalytic doping efficiency. Using acridinium-based PCs with lithium salts of varying anion size, we find that smaller anions such as bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (FSI

Indexed as

acridiniumaggregationcounterionsorganic semiconductorsphotocatalytic doping

Identifiers

PMID41926061
PMCPMC13137766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.