Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41926044›Full record

ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal2026

In vitro culture for long-term maintenance of embryonic insect cells from the house cricket Acheta domesticus.

Stephen A Schwartz, Sophia M Letcher, Noah Novick, Shwe Yee Pwint, David L Kaplan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephen A SchwartzDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby Street, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Sophia M LetcherDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby Street, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Noah NovickDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Shwe Yee PwintDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby Street, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
David L KaplanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby Street, Medford, MA, 02155, USA. david.kaplan@tufts.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9245-7774

Funding

U.S. Department of Agriculture 2021-05678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insect cell culture has become foundational for many areas of research and biotechnological innovation, yet major taxonomic gaps persist, particularly among orthopteran species. Here, we report the isolation and long-term maintenance of primary embryonic cells derived from the house cricket, Acheta domesticus. By isolating cells from late-stage embryos and culturing them at 29°C in Shields and Sang M3 insect cell media supplemented with 1 mg/mL yeast extract, 2.5 mg/mL Bacto Peptone, 100 µg/mL primocin, and 20% heat inactivated FBS, we were able to establish robust primary cultures of small, rounded cells. Passaging via mechanical sloughing preserved cell viability and supported 37.7 cumulative doublings over 287 days, thus, an average doubling time of 182.4 h. The results highlight the importance of conditioned media for sustaining proliferation, while also identifying challenges related to metabolite accumulation and slow doubling times. These preliminary findings provide an avenue for expanding the diversity of insect cell lines, with promising implications for both cellular agriculture and fundamental biotechnology research.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesEmbryo, NonmammalianGryllidaeAnimalsCell LineCell ProliferationCell SurvivalCulture Media, ConditionedCulture Media, ConditionedAcheta domesticusCricketOrthopteraPrimary embryonic cell line

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.