Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41925993›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2026

Evolving Paradigms in China's Human Genetic Resource Regulation : From Biopiracy Prevention to Bridging National Interests and Global Collaboration.

Jiajia Yu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jiajia YuKoGuan School of Law, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Huashan Road 1954, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200030, China. jiajiay@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4696-1726

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While existing literature often portrays China's human genetic resource (HGR) regulations as primarily restrictive, this report demonstrates their evolution towards a more sophisticated and balanced framework. First, China's transition from addressing biopiracy to incorporating HGR management into national security frameworks reflects a reconceptualization of genetic resources as strategic assets. Second, regulatory changes since 2023 show increasing flexibility in international collaboration, particularly in clinical trials, whilst maintaining protective measures. Third, regarding ethical management, the absence of clear legal distinctions between HGRs at the natural state and processed cellular products may negatively affect biotech industry development, while donors' property rights over their genetic resources remain unsettled. These findings demonstrate how China has continuously refined its HGR regulatory framework to protect national interests whilst advancing innovation and international scientific cooperation.

Indexed as

BioethicsBiopiracyBiosecurityHuman genetic resourcesNagoya protocol

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.