Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41925979›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2026

Perioperative outcomes and safety of Uniportal Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (U-RATS) for anatomic lung resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Suha Kaaki, Anas B Barnawi, Hassan A Robaidi, Ashraf A Maghrabi, Adel D Almaymuni, Ammar Alzahim, Abdulrahman Almahmoud, Khalid Abdullah Alsalem, Yara Mohammed Alshehri, Haitham Sultan Alsharari and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Suha KaakiDepartment of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Anas B BarnawiCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Anbarnawi@gmail.com.
Hassan A RobaidiCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ashraf A MaghrabiDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Adel D AlmaymuniDepartment of Surgery, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ammar AlzahimKing Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman AlmahmoudCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid Abdullah AlsalemCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Yara Mohammed AlshehriCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Haitham Sultan AlsharariCollege of Medicine, AlMaarefa University, Riyadh, Riyadh Region, SA, Saudi Arabia.
Waseem M HajjarDepartment of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (U-RATS) represents a recent evolution in minimally invasive lung resection, combining the single-incision philosophy with robotic technology. However, its perioperative safety and outcomes have not been clearly defined across published studies. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and a registered protocol. PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting perioperative outcomes of U-RATS for anatomic lung resection in adults. Primary outcomes included conversion rate, morbidity, and mortality. Secondary outcomes were operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and lymph node yield. Random-effects models were applied to pool estimates. Sixteen studies encompassing 579 patients were included. The pooled conversion rate was 1.34% (95% CI: 0.42–4.15%), with no observed heterogeneity. The pooled postoperative morbidity rate was 5.99% (95% CI: 4.46–7.91%), and the pooled mortality rate was 0.21% (95% CI: 0.07–0.64%). The pooled mean operative time was 171.3 min, the estimated blood loss was 51.9 mL, and the postoperative length of stay was 4.9 days. Across 11 studies, the pooled lymph node yield was 16.6 nodes (95% CI: 14.0–19.2; I² = 89.8%). Current evidence suggests that U-RATS is a safe and feasible approach for anatomic lung resection, with low conversion and complication rates and acceptable perioperative outcomes comparable to established minimally invasive techniques.

Indexed as

LungPneumonectomyRobotic Surgical ProceduresThoracic Surgical ProceduresBlood Loss, SurgicalHumansLength of StayOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeLobectomyLung resectionMeta-analysisSegmentectomyUniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgeryU-RATS

Identifiers

PMID41925979
PMCPMC13046652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.