Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41925938›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2026

Allelic diversity, phylogeny and population structure of globally collected guava germplasm (Psidium spp.) unveiled through genome-wide g-SSR markers.

Prabhanshu Mishra, Ankita Kashyap, Rakesh Singh, R M Sharma, Gyan Prakash Mishra, Jai Prakash, Avantika Maurya, Kritidipta Pramanik, Parth J Jadhav, Bharat Yadav and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Prabhanshu MishraDivision of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Ankita KashyapDivision of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Rakesh SinghDivision of Genomic Resources, ICAR- National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, 110012, India.
R M SharmaDivision of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Gyan Prakash MishraDivision of Genetics and Plant Breeding, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Jai PrakashDivision of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Avantika MauryaDivision of Genomic Resources, ICAR- National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Kritidipta PramanikDivision of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Parth J JadhavDivision of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Bharat YadavDivision of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Md Shams NihalDivision of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Amit Kumar GoswamiDivision of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India. amit.tkg@gmail.com.
Chavlesh KumarDivision of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India. ckfruits2016@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuava (Psidium guajava L.) is an economically and nutritionally important fruit crop, though Indian cultivars possess a narrow genetic base, as most of the cultivars are derived from Allahabad Safeda and its selections. To broaden the genetic base, 78 guava genotypes representing cultivars, selections, exotic/ USDA introductions, and wild species have been collected and conserved in the guava field gene bank at ICAR–IARI, New Delhi. Comprehensive molecular characterization of this germplasm is crucial for effective management, detection of duplicates or misclassified accessions, and for enriching the genetic base to facilitate the development of novel guava cultivars.

resultsOut of 60 g-SSR markers screened, 44 (73.3%) were polymorphic, generating 187 alleles with an average of 4.25 alleles per locus. The mean gene diversity was 0.58 with observed Heterozygosity was 0.148 and Polymorphic information content (PIC) values ranged from 0.177 to 0.721 (mean 0.52). Neighbour-Joining analysis classified the guava genotypes into three major clusters, effectively separating wild species, indigenously developed cultivars, and USDA introductions. STRUCTURE analysis identified two sub-populations among the studied guava genotypes. AMOVA revealed that the majority of genetic variation (72%) resided among individuals within populations, and PCoA corroborated the clustering pattern. Furthermore, moderate-to-high cross-species transferability of SSRs was observed across the studied wild Psidium species.

conclusionsThe studied g-SSRs proved effective for efficient genetic characterization of guava germplasm, enabling identification of duplicates, synonyms, and misclassified accessions. The high allelic diversity and distinct clustering of USDA introductions and wild species highlight their potential for enriching the genetic base of guava cultivars. These findings offer important insights to support germplasm conservation, efficient management, and development of future breeding strategies to sustain the guava industry.

Indexed as

Microsatellite RepeatsPsidiumAllelesGenetic VariationGenome, PlantGenotypePhylogenyPolymorphism, GeneticGenetic ResourcesGenome-wide SSRsGuavaPopulation structure

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.