ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Young adults with primary brain tumors: predictors of referral to a fertility specialist for fertility preservation counseling and the impact on tumor treatment.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePrimary brain tumors and their treatment can affect fertility, and fertility preservation offers a way to protect future childbearing options for young adults. We investigate factors associated with referral to fertility specialists and explore the impact of fertility preservation on treatment.
methodsRetrospective review of patients aged 18–44 with primary brain tumors was performed. Patients were included if they underwent surgery and chemotherapy and/or radiation between 1/2022 and 5/2025 at our institution. Demographics, treatment modalities, and fertility-related data were collected. Statistical analyses included descriptive and comparative analysis with Fisher’s exact test and t-test.
resultsWe identified 55 patients (53% female, 55% nonwhite) who met inclusion criteria. The most common tumor type was glioma (71%); 42% of patients had WHO grade IV tumors. Thirteen patients (24%) were referred to fertility specialists, with 9 (16%) undergoing preservation (7 male, 2 female). Referred patients were younger (29 vs. 36 years, p < 0.01) and less likely to have prior children (8% vs. 43%, p = 0.02). No differences in referral patterns by sex, marital status, tumor grade, or insurance were identified. Fertility preservation resulted in slight delays in adjuvant therapy for two female patients.
conclusionFertility preservation referral rates for young adults with primary brain tumors were low, though most patients who were referred pursued preservation. Younger patients and those without children were more likely to be referred. The pursuit of fertility preservation may be associated with slight treatment delays, particularly for female patients, highlighting the need for streamlined evaluation and further study of the impact on disease trajectory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41925934What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.