ReviewMetabolic brain disease2026
Autophagy in ischemic stroke: from cellular survival mechanism to pathological damage.
Review in Metabolic brain disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitochondrial Fusion and Fission in Age-Related Cardio-Cerebral Diseases: Mechanisms and Interventions.Aging cell · 2026Review
- Running out the clock: Circadian rhythm dysfunction in cognitive disease.International review of neurobiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischemic stroke remains a leading cause of death and long-term disability, driven by oxidative stress, inflammation, and cellular energy failure. Among the adaptive mechanisms activated during ischemia, autophagy a lysosomal degradation process plays a paradoxical role in determining neuronal fate. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of autophagy’s temporal and context-dependent functions in ischemic stroke. Autophagy is initially activated as a neuroprotective response to clear damaged organelles and misfolded proteins, thereby maintaining mitochondrial integrity and reducing oxidative stress through the regulation of AMPK, mTOR, and SIRT1 signaling pathways. However, when excessively sustained, autophagy becomes maladaptive, promoting neuronal apoptosis, blood–brain barrier disruption, and neuroinflammation. Selective autophagy forms including mitophagy, lipophagy, ribophagy, pexophagy, and aggrephagy further modulate ischemic outcomes by targeting specific subcellular components for degradation. Experimental evidence demonstrates that controlled activation of autophagy alleviates ischemic injury, while overactivation leads to cellular demise. Pharmacologic modulators such as rapamycin, resveratrol, metformin, and propofol have shown potential in restoring autophagic balance and reducing infarct size in preclinical models. Collectively, autophagy functions as a double-edged sword in ischemic stroke, where its beneficial or detrimental effects depend on timing, duration, and intensity of activation. Understanding the molecular switches governing this balance could enable the design of targeted autophagy modulators to optimize neuroprotection and recovery in ischemic stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41925931What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.