SynthesisJournal of neurology2026
Sonographic optic nerve sheath diameter measurement for detecting intracranial hypertension in a suspected population: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic thresholds and influencing factors.
Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIn this study, we aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of sonographic optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurements for detecting intracranial hypertension (ICH). Our objectives included evaluating its diagnostic precision compared with invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring; exploring potential sources of heterogeneity, such as measurement technique (multi vs. single-planar), population demographics (Asian vs. non-Asian), and major etiologies; and determining validated thresholds for prompt bedside ICP assessment in acute neurological crises. DATA SOURCES: We comprehensively searched eight databases, including four in English (PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE®, and Embase) and four in Chinese (China National Knowledge Infrastructure [CNKI], Wanfang, VIP, and SinoMed). The search covered literature published from the inception of the databases up to May 31, 2025. STUDY SELECTION: This review includes prospective, retrospective, and case-control studies that assess the efficacy of sonographic ONSD measurement for detecting ICH, defined as an ICP exceeding 20 mm Hg, 20 cmH DATA EXTRACTION: X.T. and Q.T. independently screened the studies and assessed the risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Diagnostic accuracy was pooled using a bivariate random-effects model to generate summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves. Subgroup analyses of the measurement technique, study population, and etiology were conducted. Publication bias was assessed using Deeks' test. DATA SYNTHESIS: The decision tree analysis revealed that an ONSD ≥ 5.1 mm is the critical diagnostic threshold for detecting intracranial hypertension. The regression tree model indicated a range of CDEI values from 0.64 to 0.95, with a root node value of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.79-0.85). The incorporation of a multiplanar assessment significantly enhanced the prediction of favorable outcomes (CDEI > 0.85; p < 0.001). Moreover, compared with a 20 mmHg threshold, a 25 cmH₂O threshold resulted in greater specificity (88.4% vs. 82.9%) and a higher positive likelihood ratio (LR+ 6.5 vs. 5.0). The utilization of multiplane techniques and experienced operators notably improved diagnostic accuracy, leading to a 50% reduction in missed diagnoses (LR- 0.1). Nontraumatic brain injury cases exhibited superior sensitivity (91.9% vs. 85.2%) and a 107% higher diagnostic odds ratio (63.3 vs. 30.5) than traumatic brain injury cases did.
conclusionsFindings from this study suggest that an ONSD threshold ≥ 5.1 mm is a promising diagnostic marker for elevated ICP (> 20 cmH₂O/mmHg or acute etiology), although external validation is needed. A multiplane evaluation improves its predictive accuracy for favorable outcomes. The developed decision model supports the use of sonographic ONSD measurement as a supplementary screening tool in emergency and critical care, particularly when invasive monitoring is unavailable. Additionally, an ONSD of approximately 6.0 mm is a potential prognostic indicator for unfavorable outcomes, highlighting a key area for future research. These findings can only be applied after their validation through multicenter studies and the establishment of standardized measurement protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41925916What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.