Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41925886›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2026

Investigating Environmental Features and Network Interdependencies in Network Formation: A Study of Collaborative, Community-Based Watershed Restoration.

Nicholas Oesterling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nicholas OesterlingSyracuse University - Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs 400 Eggers Hall, Syracuse, NY, USA. naoester@syr.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3396-8777

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public policies, particularly those addressing environmental problems, increasingly depend on the work of networks of governmental and non-governmental actors to achieve policy goals, making an understanding of the formation of these networks imperative for the study and practice of environmental management. Past scholarship often examines networks for collaborative policymaking or interorganizational planning, with less attention being given to networks in which participants take hands-on action together to tackle public problems "on the ground". Yet, these action-oriented networks can be crucial for policy implementation. This paper responds to this knowledge gap by analyzing the formation of purpose-oriented networks (PONs) by organizational actors for collaborative restoration projects in Oregon watersheds. PONs form when actors consciously convene under some shared affiliation to work together, potentially through cross-sector collaboration, to accomplish some shared goal(s). Through regression analyses using over two decades of data on thousands of PONs and their participants, I investigate factors that may influence when and where these networks form. I find PON formation may be catalyzed by increased resource contributions to previously-formed networks, the presence of more saturated network environments (i.e., environments where more networks developed in the prior year), and stakeholders' prior participation in multiple networks simultaneously. Moreover, network formation could be diminished when PONs formed in the previous year take longer to complete their work. My findings offer researchers and practitioners novel insights into PON creation and draw attention to how the constitutive dimensions of these networks may have implications for their developmental dynamics.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesCommunity ParticipationCooperative BehaviorOregon

Identifiers

PMID41925886
PMCPMC13046605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.