ArticleInternational orthopaedics2026
Proposal and validation of an angular External Fixation Index (aEFI) for standardized reporting of gradual angular deformity correction: a time-normalized descriptive metric.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background Gradual correction of genu varum using circular external fixators is well-established. Although the External Fixation Index (EFI) is widely used in linear bone lengthening, no standardized, time-normalized metric exists for angular deformity correction. This study introduces the angular External Fixation Index (aEFI) as a descriptive tool and evaluates internal consistency within a clinical cohort treated with oblique proximal tibial corticotomy (OPTC).
methods A prospective cohort study included 22 patients (30 knees) who underwent gradual genu varum correction using OPTC and circular external fixation. The aEFI was calculated as total duration of external fixation (weeks) divided by achieved angular correction (degrees). Radiographic evaluation included medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and hip-knee-ankle angle measured preoperatively and at final follow-up. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and the Stanmore Limb Reconstruction Score.
resultsAt a mean follow-up of 16.5 ± 3.25 months, coronal alignment was restored in all knees. Mean fixation duration was 27.4 ± 6.2 weeks, with a mean aEFI of 1.89 ± 0.41 weeks/degree. An inverse association was observed between correction magnitude and aEFI (r = -0.88, p < 0.001), reflecting the reduced proportional effect of fixed treatment phases with larger corrections. Functional scores improved, and minor pin-tract infections occurred in 20% of knees and resolved conservatively.
conclusion The proposed aEFI serves as a standardized, descriptive, time-normalized metric for reporting treatment duration relative to angular correction. External validation across different constructs and deformity patterns is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.