ArticleMedical physics2026
Passive cavitation imaging with p
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPassive cavitation imaging (PCI) is under development to monitor histotripsy and other cavitation-mediated therapies. Image reconstruction using the conventional delay, sum, and integrate (DSI) beamforming approach produces PCI reconstructions with poor axial resolution and side lobe artifacts. Robust capon beamforming (RCB) improves imaging performance but is computationally expensive. Nonlinear beamforming approaches such as p PURPOSE: This work reports a coherence-factor modified with p
methodsHistotripsy bubble clouds were generated in vitro in a red blood cell-doped phantom and in vivo in a porcine femoral vein using focused sources with 1 MHz and 1.5 MHz center frequencies. The acoustic emissions were received passively with a curvilinear (C5-2v) and linear (L11-5v) array transducer, respectively. Beamforming was performed using RCB, prDSI, and pCFwDSI with 128, 32 and 16 elements. The performance achieved was compared using the following metrics: -6 dB axial width, signal-to-interference ratio (SIR), binary statistical analysis, and structural similarity index measure (SSIM).
resultsThe pCFwDSI approach performed the best in terms of axial width and SIR, and prDSI showed intermediate performance between pCFwDSI and RCB. For binary statistical metrics, the performance achieved with p = 3 and 128 elements was similar for both approaches (within 2% of each other). In sparse array images implemented with 16 elements, grating lobes were observed in RCB and prDSI, but were suppressed in pCFwDSI. The SSIM of the sparse array (16 elements) with pCFwDSI (p = 3) was 96.34% relative to the images generated with the full aperture of 128 elements. Frame rates ranged from 18 to 91 Hz for pCFwDSI using RF data from 128 to 16 elements, respectively, which were similar to standard DSI.
conclusionsThese results demonstrate pCFwDSI can improve axial resolution, reduce artifacts, and achieve clinically-relevant frame rates without increasing computational and data storage overhead. These findings could be a step towards enabling improved real time PCI monitoring of histotripsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.