Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41925679›Full record

ArticleComputers, informatics, nursing : CIN2026

Transforming Health Care AI Education Through Micro-learning: A Novel Partnership Model for Nursing Workforce Development.

Amy K McCarthy, Jonathan D Agnew, Jill Price, Kathy Strang, Alison McLaughlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amy K McCarthyHippocratic AI, Palo Alto, CA.
Jonathan D AgnewHippocratic AI, Palo Alto, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-2060-3568
Jill PriceChamberlain University.
Kathy StrangAdtalem Global Education, Chicago, IL.
Alison McLaughlinWalden University, Minneapolis, MN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health care professionals face an urgent need for AI literacy as artificial intelligence technologies rapidly transform clinical practice, yet nursing-specific educational resources remain scarce. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an innovative micro-learning AI education program developed through an academic-industry partnership. We implemented 11 micro-courses (4 to 5 hours each) across foundational, application, and advanced competency levels, with nursing-specific content addressing professional scope and leadership opportunities. The program was delivered through Chamberlain University Center for Faculty Excellence and Walden University School of Lifelong Learning. We analyzed enrollment data, learning outcomes, and satisfaction scores from 478 students and faculty with 612 course completions. Among 612 course completions, registered nurses comprised 49% of participants. Students demonstrated significant knowledge gains (Cohen's d=0.65, P <.001) with high satisfaction scores (mean=4.58/5.0). Faculty participants showed exceptional outcomes (satisfaction mean=4.67/5.0) with 99% expressing commitment to applying learning. Content relevance scored highest across all measures (4.61 to 4.71), indicating integration of academic rigor with practical applicability. This micro-learning approach addresses critical gaps in health care AI education through scalable, nursing-specific curriculum. The partnership model bridges academic expertise with industry relevance, providing a replicable framework for systematic workforce preparation in AI-enhanced health care delivery.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEducation, NursingLearningAcademiaCurriculumHumansModels, EducationalStudents, NursingArtificial intelligenceComputer literacyContinuingCurriculumEducationFaculty developmentNursing

Identifiers

PMID41925679
PMCPMC13143363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.