ArticleAfrican journal of primary health care & family medicine2026
Operationalising palliative care integration: Experiences of implementers in South Africa.
Article in African journal of primary health care & family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Branching-scenario games in acute end-of-life care education: cultural adaptation and health equity from a public health implementation perspective.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSouth Africa's 2017 National Policy Framework and Strategy for Palliative Care mandated the integration of palliative care (PC) into the public health system using existing resources.
aimTo explore PC implementers' (1) experiences at least 1 year after implementation; (2) implementers' capability in providing PC; (3) approaches to PC integration at selected sites and (4) perceived enablers and obstacles requiring managerial support.
settingHealthcare facilities in the Cape Metro District (CMD) of South Africa.
methodsA qualitative, exploratory design was employed in five primary healthcare facilities classified as higher- or lower-morphine-usage sites based on dispensing trends. Purposive sampling identified 29 stakeholders: 22 implementers (clinical and support staff) and seven operations managers. Data were collected in four virtual focus group discussions and one in-depth interview with implementers and one in-depth interview with managers.
resultsThree main themes emerged: (1) Provider capability: implementers reported variable confidence in clinical skills and in providing psychosocial support; (2) health systems response: participants cited insufficient staffing and time, limited training opportunities and inconsistent multidisciplinary team functionality and (3) provision of patient-centred PC: stakeholders emphasised the need for clear referral pathways, interprofessional communication and supportive leadership to ensure continuity of care.
conclusionPalliative care implementers' engagement in policy design and resource allocation is essential for sustainable implementation. Strengthening multidisciplinary teamwork, embedding PC content in undergraduate curricula and providing ongoing managerial support will enhance equitable access to quality palliative services.Contribution: Understanding how frontline stakeholders operationalise PC integration is essential for refining policy and practice in low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.