Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41925597›Full record

ArticleSouth African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care2026

Reconfiguring global primary care evidence: The essential role of regional journals.

Shailendra Prasad, Klaus B Von Pressentin, Bassim Birkland, Ramakrishna Prasad, Esther M Johnston, Diego Garcia-Huidobro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shailendra PrasadDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States; and, The Global Engagement Network for Primary Health Care, Minneapolis, United States; and, Center for Global Health and Social Responsibility, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. pras0054@umn.edu.
Klaus B Von Pressentin
Bassim Birkland
Ramakrishna Prasad
Esther M Johnston
Diego Garcia-Huidobro

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary care research (PCR) strengthens health systems and informs policy, but is dominated by high-income country (HIC) institutions and authors creating epistemic injustice by marginalising local knowledge from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and reinforcing structural inequities. Regional journals are vital for providing accessible, relevant evidence by lowering publishing barriers, supporting emerging researchers, enabling multilingual dissemination, and creating practice-focused knowledge for local health systems. Strengthening regional publishing is essential for a diverse, equitable global evidence base that improves the relevance, impact, and fairness of global PCR.Contribution: This article advances primary care scholarship by invoking epistemic justice and emphasising regional journals as vital for equitable knowledge. It references journals such as South African Family Practice, which celebrates 45 years of local research and mentorship. It links representation, research, and publishing, critiques citation metrics, and offers strategies to improve regional journals and promote justice in global primary care evidence.

Indexed as

Periodicals as TopicPrimary Health CareDeveloping CountriesGlobal HealthHumansSouth Africaepistemic justiceglobal primary carehealth systemsprimary care researchregional journals

Identifiers

PMID41925597
PMCPMC13058556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.