Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41925596›Full record

ArticleSouth African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care2026

South African family medicine research: Past, present and future.

Robert J Mash

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Robert J MashDivision of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town. rm@sun.ac.za.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 45 years, the publication of original research in the South African Family Practice journal has steadily increased from humble beginnings in the 1980s to approximately 40-50 articles per year. This reflects the growth of the discipline and new speciality of family medicine as well as the shift in national policy towards primary health care as the foundation of the health system. Despite this growth, the profile of the research remains largely descriptive with surveys, audits and exploratory qualitative studies. The implication of this is that the discipline may not be addressing critical research questions on effectiveness, efficiency or identifying risk factors for common or important conditions. There is diversity of research questions and topics, although some areas remain relatively neglected, such as research on children, pregnant mothers, palliative care, rehabilitation, continuity and coordination.Contribution: As we look forward to the future, the discipline should be ready to analyse new electronic sources of 'big data', develop capacity for clinical trials and cost-effectiveness studies, launch more practice-based research networks, strengthen the whole research capacity-building pipeline and set priorities at a national level.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchFamily PracticePrimary Health CareHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansSouth Africaclinical trialsfamily medicineprimary care researchresearchresearch capacity buildingresearch networks

Identifiers

PMID41925596
PMCPMC13058503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.