ArticleThe Onderstepoort journal of veterinary research2026
Selection of the best method for inherent tannin reduction and high nutrient retention.
Article in The Onderstepoort journal of veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Raw legume seeds used in feed contain high antinutritive factors, such as tannins, which threaten livestock farming. Hence, the aim of the study was to (1) carry out single (raw plus dehulling [R + D]; soaking plus dehulling [S + D]; autoclaving plus dehulling [A + D]; infusion plus dehulling [I + D]; microwaving plus dehulling [M + D]; cooking plus dehulling [C + D] and combination [S + A + D; S + I + D; S + M + D; S + C + D; I + M + D, I + A + D]) processing methods on Cicer arietinum, Arachis hypogaea, and Phaseolus vulgaris; (2) determine dry weight yield and tannin reduction; (3) perform proximate and mineral analysis; (4) select the best method based on cost-effectiveness, high tannin reduction and high nutrient retention. The legume seeds were processed, dried, ground, and analysed for dry weight yield, tannin reduction, and proximate (ash, moisture, protein) and mineral (magnesium [Mg], zinc (Zn], copper [Cu], iron [Fe]) contents. A microplate reader and inductively coupled plasma were used as analytical tools. The results showed the highest (97.7%) and lowest (53%) dry weight yields in R + D and I + A + D, respectively. Effective tannin reductions were recorded in I + D (97.8%), S + D (93.9%), S + C + D (96.6%), S + M + D (92.2%), S + I + D (93.8), C + D (91.8%) and S + A + D (84.6%) methods with statistical significance (p 0.05). Furthermore, ash, moisture, proteins and mineral retention had a range of 29% - 62% to indicate that tannin removal had no effect on nutrient compositions. Although S + M + D (62%) had the highest nutrient retention, S + D (53%) was selected as the best method as it satisfied all the requirements.Contribution: An effective processing method for use in rural farming to reduce tannins without compromising nutrition of the legume seeds was introduced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.