ReviewWomen's health (London, England)
Exploring the impact of Ramadan fasting on women's reproductive health: A narrative review.
Review in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ramadan is the ninth month of the Islamic lunar calendar in which Muslims abstain from consumption of food and drink, smoking, and engaging in sexual activity during daylight hours for the full lunar month, approximately 29-30 days. Beyond its spiritual significance, fasting during this month represents a distinct physiologic and cultural practice that may influence women's reproductive health. This narrative review integrates findings from published studies to summarize current evidence on the impact of Ramadan fasting (RF) on the menstrual cycle, fertility, polycystic ovary syndrome, pregnancy, and breastfeeding. Relevant literature was identified through PubMed and Embase using keywords related to Ramadan and women's health, with emphasis on qualitative synthesis and critical interpretation rather than quantitative comparison. Across the literature, RF appears to cause mild and temporary menstrual irregularities without major hormonal changes. Fertility hormones generally remain stable. Among pregnant and breastfeeding women, most studies report no significant differences in maternal or neonatal health between fasting and non-fasting groups, though findings vary by region, nutritional intake, and gestational timing. While immediate birth outcomes appear largely unaffected, long-term effects have been elucidated through recent studies. Collectively, the evidence highlights the physiologic adaptability of women during RF while revealing the need for more comprehensive research on RF's effect on women's health. Gaining insight into this area of research contributes to a more inclusive and culturally sensitive approach to healthcare, targeting the unique needs of female Muslim patients. This will allow healthcare providers to leverage this research to establish rapport with their patients and deliver attuned, quality care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.