Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41925288›Full record

ReviewThe Veterinary record2026

'Reservoir dogs': The emerging zoonotic risk associated with European dog imports to the UK.

Poppy Simonson, Tapan Bhattacharyya, Michael A Miles

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Veterinary record, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Poppy SimonsonDepartment of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4527-2029
Tapan BhattacharyyaDepartment of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Michael A MilesDepartment of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe movement of dogs from continental Europe to the UK poses a growing public health threat due to the associated risk of disease incursions. Current legislation is insufficient to address the risks and pre-import control measures are focused only on rabies virus and the fox tapeworm Echinococcus multilocularis.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review to summarise the major zoonotic pathogens and vectors associated with imported dogs (including rabies virus, Brucella canis and exotic tick species), and explore their potential to become established in the UK. Gaps in existing research and surveillance are highlighted, and potential measures to strengthen control are discussed. LIMITATIONS: Only English-language sources were included in the literature search. Data on imported dogs and their disease burden are limited.

conclusionsRaising awareness of the risks among veterinary staff-who play a central role in recognising, managing and preventing imported zoonoses-is integral to a One Health approach.

Indexed as

Communicable Diseases, EmergingCommunicable Diseases, ImportedDisease ReservoirsDog DiseasesTravelZoonosesAnimalsDogsEuropeHumansUnited Kingdomdog travelone healthvector‐borne diseasezoonoses

Identifiers

PMID41925288
PMCPMC13543743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.