ArticleJACC. Case reports2026
Cardiac Tamponade Revealing a New Diagnosis of Malignancy: When Intervention Is the Answer.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHemodynamically significant pericardial effusions during pregnancy are rare but require urgent multidisciplinary intervention to determine necessity and timing of intervention. CASE SUMMARY: A 34-year-old nulliparous woman at 35 weeks and 4 days of gestation presented with acute chest pain and dyspnea. Evaluation revealed sinus tachycardia and a large pericardial effusion with clinical and echocardiographic signs of tamponade. Urgent pericardial drainage was performed, yielding 620 mL of sanguineous fluid. Cytology revealed malignant cells consistent with lung adenocarcinoma. The patient underwent a cesarean delivery and was ultimately diagnosed with stage IVB EML4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive lung adenocarcinoma. DISCUSSION: Although pericardial effusions in pregnancy can be common, cardiac tamponade is rare and requires timely intervention and further evaluation. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: Multidisciplinary collaboration is needed to determine the necessity and timing of intervention for pericardial effusions causing hemodynamic compromise in pregnancy. Sanguineous effusions should prompt evaluation for both aortic dissection and malignancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.