ReviewCurrent opinion in neurology2026
Big data in multiple sclerosis.
Review in Current opinion in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review summarizes recent key advancements in multiple sclerosis (MS) achieved through the utilization of big data from diverse sources and advanced analytical techniques. RECENT
findingsReal-world evidence (RWE) derived from MS big data has significantly enhanced treatment strategies, redefined the concept of disease progression, refined prognostic models, and facilitated personalized medicine. RWE has highlighted the long-term benefits of early intensive treatment compared to escalation strategies, the unfavorable risk profile associated with treatment de-escalation and the importance of managing treatments during pregnancy. Additionally, it has revealed similarities and differences in the effectiveness and safety of specific high-efficacy therapies, as well as key predictors for switching treatments. RWE has also emphasized the central role of progression independent of relapse activity as a significant driver of disability and predictor of unfavorable long-term outcomes in both adult and pediatric onset MS. A data-driven approach utilizing artificial intelligence and big data has established a comprehensive framework for understanding the disease's evolution. Multimodal big data frameworks - encompassing clinical data, MRI, genomics, biomarkers, and app-based metrics - have demonstrated their ability to enhance diagnostic performance and risk stratification in MS. SUMMARY: Big data approaches are transforming MS research and clinical practice by providing stronger RWE to guide therapeutic decision-making, refining models of disease progression, and developing more precise prognostic tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.