Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41925091›Full record

ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2026

Clinical Practice Patterns for Discussing Hydroxyurea Initiation With Families of Children With Sickle Cell Disease.

Aimee K Hildenbrand, Amy Lang, Anna M Hood, Benjamin Bear, Melissa A Alderfer, Charles T Quinn, Lori E Crosby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aimee K HildenbrandCenter For Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health, Wilmington, USA.
Amy LangSchool of Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Carbondale, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1905-8013
Anna M HoodManchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Benjamin BearCenter For Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health, Wilmington, USA.
Melissa A AlderferCenter For Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health, Wilmington, USA.
Charles T QuinnDivision of Hematology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2372-2175
Lori E CrosbyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6656-7745

Funding

The eye as a window into sickle cell disease morbidityP20GM109021 · NIGMS · NEMOURS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, DELAWARE · PI BROUSSEAU, DAVID C · 2014 to 2025
$20.7M
National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) P20GM109021NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109021Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute CDR-1609-36055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite robust evidence of safety and efficacy, hydroxyurea (HU) uptake remains low for children with sickle cell disease (SCD). Guidelines recommend use of shared decision-making for HU initiation, but limited resources exist to inform these conversations with families. This study examined practices among hematology providers when introducing HU to families of children with SCD. PROCEDURE: In Study 1, 11 pediatric SCD clinics within the United States completed process maps delineating their practice for discussing HU initiation with families. Process maps were compared to summarize processes. In Study 2, individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine healthcare providers from one clinic from Study 1. Thematic and descriptive content analysis were used to summarize provider perspectives on existing processes.

resultsProcess maps highlighted the following common steps: (1) check in for appointment and obtain laboratory studies (n = 8); (2) medical provider discusses HU with family (n = 11); (3) family given HU materials (n = 8); and, (4) follow-up HU discussion at next visit (n = 6). Process variations were also identified. In Study 2, providers universally reported introducing HU shortly after diagnosis and strongly encouraging it for patients with disease complications. HU education was provided primarily via in-person conversation, written materials, and websites, focusing on its expected benefits, historical context, and side effects.

conclusionsWe identified both similarities and variations in clinical practice for HU initiation in children with SCD. Results highlight potential opportunities to improve the ways in which HU initiation is discussed with families of children with SCD.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellAntisickling AgentsHydroxyureaPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleAntisickling AgentsHydroxyureachildrenclinical practicehydroxyureainitiationsickle cell disease

Identifiers

PMID41925091
PMCPMC13629226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.