ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2026
Clinical Practice Patterns for Discussing Hydroxyurea Initiation With Families of Children With Sickle Cell Disease.
Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite robust evidence of safety and efficacy, hydroxyurea (HU) uptake remains low for children with sickle cell disease (SCD). Guidelines recommend use of shared decision-making for HU initiation, but limited resources exist to inform these conversations with families. This study examined practices among hematology providers when introducing HU to families of children with SCD. PROCEDURE: In Study 1, 11 pediatric SCD clinics within the United States completed process maps delineating their practice for discussing HU initiation with families. Process maps were compared to summarize processes. In Study 2, individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine healthcare providers from one clinic from Study 1. Thematic and descriptive content analysis were used to summarize provider perspectives on existing processes.
resultsProcess maps highlighted the following common steps: (1) check in for appointment and obtain laboratory studies (n = 8); (2) medical provider discusses HU with family (n = 11); (3) family given HU materials (n = 8); and, (4) follow-up HU discussion at next visit (n = 6). Process variations were also identified. In Study 2, providers universally reported introducing HU shortly after diagnosis and strongly encouraging it for patients with disease complications. HU education was provided primarily via in-person conversation, written materials, and websites, focusing on its expected benefits, historical context, and side effects.
conclusionsWe identified both similarities and variations in clinical practice for HU initiation in children with SCD. Results highlight potential opportunities to improve the ways in which HU initiation is discussed with families of children with SCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.