ArticleGenome biology and evolution2026
Genetic Footprints of Seasonal Fluctuating Selection: A Comparison With Established Selection Forms.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dissecting Fluctuating Selection: A Unified Population and Quantitative Genetics Framework.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fluctuating selection is frequently studied in natural populations by observing allele frequency trajectories over evolutionarily brief timeframes or through theoretical analyses of frequency dynamics. However, little is known of its effect on linked neutral diversity. Here, we simulate seasonally fluctuating selection at a single locus and characterize its genomic footprint using diversity, site-frequency spectrum (SFS), and haplotype-based statistics. We find that adaptively fluctuating loci exhibit distinct signals that depend on when in the seasonal cycle the population was sampled and whether sampling occurs early or late relative to the onset of the cyclic selection pressure. Compared with other modes of selection acting on a single locus, adaptively fluctuating loci show genomic signatures that are not shared by hard and soft selective sweeps but overlap considerably with heterozygote advantage. Leveraging linear discriminant analysis, we identify a combination of summary statistics that most effectively distinguish fluctuating selection from heterozygote advantage. Our findings shed light on the characteristic genomic signatures of fluctuating selection and imply that in-depth analyses of the long-term dynamics of adaptively fluctuating loci is achievable from sequence data collected from one or two time points across a selection cycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.