ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2026
Effect of vein characteristics and operator experience on intravenous catheter insertion success in cats in an emergency room.
Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectivesThe aim of the present study was to identify patient, vein and operator factors associated with first-attempt success of peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion in cats presenting to an emergency room.MethodsA prospective study was conducted in the emergency room of a university small animal hospital between February and April 2024. Cats requiring PIVC insertion were enrolled. Data collected included patient signalment, vein visibility and palpability, catheter size, indication for catheterization and operator characteristics (role, years of experience and estimated number of previous PIVC insertions). First-attempt success was defined as catheterization with visible blood flashback and successful flushing without extravasation or discomfort. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess associations with first-attempt success.ResultsA total of 97 PIVC insertions in 95 cats were analyzed. Overall, first-attempt success was 85.6% (n = 83/97). Most insertions involved the cephalic vein (96.9%) and 22 G catheters (57.7%). Neither catheter size, target vein nor indication for insertion was significantly associated with success. Operators with 8-15 years of experience had significantly higher odds of success compared with those with 2 years or less (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.