Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41924966›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2026

Global disparities in the recognition, diagnosis, and management of seizures or epilepsy of autoimmune etiology.

Emily Guarasci, Robyn Whitney, Adrian Budhram, Maryam Nabavi Nouri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily GuarasciChildren's Health Research Institute, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1306-2116
Robyn WhitneyDepartment of Paediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6851-0646
Adrian BudhramLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4860-0470
Maryam Nabavi NouriChildren's Health Research Institute, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6317-4890

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite advancements in "autoimmune epilepsy," more accurately referred to herein as seizures or epilepsy of autoimmune etiology, significant variability exists in its recognition, diagnosis, and management internationally. This study assessed clinicians' understanding, access to diagnostic tools, and treatment practices across global regions.

methodsAn online survey, "Recognizing Autoimmune Seizures" was disseminated globally through professional networks including the Canadian League Against Epilepsy (CLAE), International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE), Young Epilepsy Section (YES), and American Epilepsy Society (AES).

resultsThe survey included 157 respondents: adult neurologists (50%), pediatric neurologists (38%), other healthcare professionals (8%), and trainees (6%). Although 69% reported familiarity with updated ILAE definitions for seizures or epilepsy of autoimmune etiology, 43% noted difficulty with clinical identification. Familiarity varied significantly by region (p = 0.024) and was highest in Europe (76%) and Asia/South/Central America (73%) versus North America (50%). In Asia and South/Central America, 66% of respondents reported difficulty accessing neural antibody testing, compared with 22% in North America and 17% in Europe (p < 0.001), largely due to financial barriers in resource-limited regions (87%; p < 0.001). As a result, clinicians in these settings more frequently treated patients empirically with immunotherapy without confirmatory testing (72%; p < 0.001). Further, adult providers more often identified anti-GAD65 (73% vs. 52%), anti-LGI1 (83% vs. 36%), and paraneoplastic antibodies (79% vs. 31%), whereas pediatric clinicians more frequently encountered anti-MOG-associated seizures (84% vs. 58%; all p ≤ 0.015). SIGNIFICANCE: The survey highlights a clear knowledge-to-practice gap in the recognition and diagnosis of seizures or epilepsy of autoimmune etiology. While many are familiar with conceptual definitions, a substantial proportion lack confidence in clinical identification. Respondents emphasized that both knowledge gaps and limited access to diagnostic resources contribute to ongoing disparities in care. There is a pressing need for regionally tailored international initiatives to facilitate clinician education and improve equitable access to neural antibody testing. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This global survey of 157 clinicians found that while familiarity with conceptual definitions of seizures and epilepsy of autoimmune etiology was high, clinical recognition remained limited, revealing a clear knowledge-to-practice gap. Familiarity varied by region, highest in Europe and South/Central America and Asia, and lowest in North America. Access to neural antibody testing was most constrained in Asia and South/Central America, where limited public funding and high out-of-pocket costs were major barriers, leading clinicians to rely more often on empirical immunotherapy. These regional differences highlight the need for context-specific strategies rather than one-size-fits-all solutions to improve equitable care.

Indexed as

Autoimmune DiseasesEpilepsyHealthcare DisparitiesSeizuresAdultGlobal HealthHumansNeurologistsSurveys and Questionnairesautoimmune‐associated epilepsyautoimmune encephalitisepilepsyhealth services accessibilityneural antibody

Identifiers

PMID41924966
PMCPMC13238627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.