ArticleEpilepsia open2026
Global disparities in the recognition, diagnosis, and management of seizures or epilepsy of autoimmune etiology.
Article in Epilepsia open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDespite advancements in "autoimmune epilepsy," more accurately referred to herein as seizures or epilepsy of autoimmune etiology, significant variability exists in its recognition, diagnosis, and management internationally. This study assessed clinicians' understanding, access to diagnostic tools, and treatment practices across global regions.
methodsAn online survey, "Recognizing Autoimmune Seizures" was disseminated globally through professional networks including the Canadian League Against Epilepsy (CLAE), International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE), Young Epilepsy Section (YES), and American Epilepsy Society (AES).
resultsThe survey included 157 respondents: adult neurologists (50%), pediatric neurologists (38%), other healthcare professionals (8%), and trainees (6%). Although 69% reported familiarity with updated ILAE definitions for seizures or epilepsy of autoimmune etiology, 43% noted difficulty with clinical identification. Familiarity varied significantly by region (p = 0.024) and was highest in Europe (76%) and Asia/South/Central America (73%) versus North America (50%). In Asia and South/Central America, 66% of respondents reported difficulty accessing neural antibody testing, compared with 22% in North America and 17% in Europe (p < 0.001), largely due to financial barriers in resource-limited regions (87%; p < 0.001). As a result, clinicians in these settings more frequently treated patients empirically with immunotherapy without confirmatory testing (72%; p < 0.001). Further, adult providers more often identified anti-GAD65 (73% vs. 52%), anti-LGI1 (83% vs. 36%), and paraneoplastic antibodies (79% vs. 31%), whereas pediatric clinicians more frequently encountered anti-MOG-associated seizures (84% vs. 58%; all p ≤ 0.015). SIGNIFICANCE: The survey highlights a clear knowledge-to-practice gap in the recognition and diagnosis of seizures or epilepsy of autoimmune etiology. While many are familiar with conceptual definitions, a substantial proportion lack confidence in clinical identification. Respondents emphasized that both knowledge gaps and limited access to diagnostic resources contribute to ongoing disparities in care. There is a pressing need for regionally tailored international initiatives to facilitate clinician education and improve equitable access to neural antibody testing. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This global survey of 157 clinicians found that while familiarity with conceptual definitions of seizures and epilepsy of autoimmune etiology was high, clinical recognition remained limited, revealing a clear knowledge-to-practice gap. Familiarity varied by region, highest in Europe and South/Central America and Asia, and lowest in North America. Access to neural antibody testing was most constrained in Asia and South/Central America, where limited public funding and high out-of-pocket costs were major barriers, leading clinicians to rely more often on empirical immunotherapy. These regional differences highlight the need for context-specific strategies rather than one-size-fits-all solutions to improve equitable care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.