Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41924957›Full record

ReviewDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2026

Cell cycle in plant development and reprogramming.

Laura R Lee, Keiko U Torii

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development (Cambridge, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laura R LeeDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2821-7469
Keiko U ToriiHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6168-427X

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical InstituteThe University of Texas at Austin
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of multicellular organisms relies on controlled cell divisions and differentiation that generate specific cell types of functional tissues and organs. Control of the cell cycle and its checkpoints are tightly intertwined with the maintenance of stem cells, cell fate acquisition and cellular reprogramming. This Review focuses on cell cycle-mediated control of plant development and regeneration, where cell division and differentiation occur in the absence of cell migration. We examine two systems - the root apical meristem and leaf epidermis (stomata) - and explore how master-regulatory transcription factors directly impact the cell cycle to achieve differentiation of specific cell types, as well as how epigenetic machineries guide or constrain such processes. We further emphasize the importance of G1 cell cycle phase duration and G2/M checkpoints for stem cell differentiation and regeneration. By synthesizing recent discoveries, we aim to highlight cell cycle regulation that underpins both robustness and plasticity of plant development and regeneration. Such knowledge will ultimately enhance our understanding of the commonalities and uniqueness of cell cycle regulation between plants and metazoans.

Indexed as

Cell CycleCellular ReprogrammingPlant DevelopmentCell DifferentiationEpigenesis, GeneticMeristemRegenerationStem CellsCell cycleReprogrammingRootsStem cellsStomata

Identifiers

PMID41924957
PMCPMC13086495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.