ReviewHaematologica2026
Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in rare hematologic entities: monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic and bleeding significance.
Review in Haematologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monoclonal gammopathies encompass a spectrum of clonal B-cell or plasma cell disorders characterized by the production of a monoclonal immunoglobulin. While most cases remain asymptomatic, certain clones can elicit organ or tissue injury through distinct pathogenic mechanisms, leading to the concept of monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance (MGCS). Among the least recognized but clinically important MGCS entities are monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance (MGTS) and monoclonal gammopathy of bleeding significance (MGBS), in which the M-protein directly interferes with hemostatic pathways, resulting in thrombosis or bleeding. These conditions remain underdiagnosed due to their heterogeneous clinical presentations and challenges in establishing causal relationships between the paraprotein and hemostatic abnormalities. MGTS and MGBS encompass diverse mechanisms, including cryoprotein formation, complement activation, coagulation factor inhibition, and von Willebrand factor or platelet dysfunction. Currently, there are no standardized diagnostic criteria or evidence-based treatment recommendations, and the role of anti-clonal therapy remains undefined. This perspective outlines an ongoing multinational initiative under the auspices of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee (ISTH SSC) Subcommittee on Cancer-Associated Thrombosis and Hemostasis, aiming to define diagnostic pathways, propose classification and treatment criteria, and identify patients who may benefit from targeted therapies. A unified framework will improve recognition, diagnosis, and management of these rare yet clinically significant entities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.