ArticleThe Veterinary record2026
How does attendance at Schwartz Rounds affect veterinary professionals' experience in clinical practice?
Article in The Veterinary record, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSchwartz Rounds are a group reflective forum for healthcare staff to openly and safely discuss the emotional aspects of their work. With the plethora of challenges facing veterinary professionals, any organisational intervention that could help support team wellbeing should be evaluated to provide evidence for any beneficial claims.
methodsTen veterinary professionals who had attended two or more Schwartz Rounds in clinical practice were interviewed to explore their experience with the initiative. Transcripts were processed via reflexive thematic analysis to generate themes.
resultsThree themes were generated: 'enabling compassion', 'empowering vulnerability' and 'enhancing organisational insight'. Schwartz Rounds attendees showed compassion for themselves and others through shared storytelling and active listening. Witnessing senior colleagues showcased vulnerabilities, built team connectedness and helped humanise leaders. Finally, Schwartz Rounds provided attendees with organisational insight into the wider workplace experience of others. LIMITATIONS: Non-clinical team members' experiences were not included in this study. Impacts on patient care and client experience would broaden clinical practice insights.
conclusionsThere is evidence to show that Schwartz Rounds positively impact the working conditions of veterinary professionals in clinical practice and leads to changes in workplace culture through shared understanding, improved colleague relationships and enabling compassion in the workplace.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.