SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
The emerging trends of healthcare professions' ethics education in recent 10 years: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interpreting in healthcare: a systematic search and mapping of ethical issues in health literature.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Because of globalization and advancement of AI technology, the trends of healthcare professions' ethics education have changed significantly. However, the available literature reviews may not reflect current trends, lacking consistency in the teaching topics, and assessment standards of ethics education. Furthermore, no systematic review has examined the relationship between different medical ethics education topics. Objective: To fill these gaps, it is a key point that medical educators and institutions work toward establishing a standardized and comprehensive framework for medical ethics education. In this case, this research aimed to provide a comprehensive review of the academic research surrounding medical ethics education for medical students and professions. Methods: A systematic search following PRISMA guidelines conducted across databases, including PubMed and Web of Science for recent papers published on medical ethics education from 2015 to 2025. Post-screening, 145 studies met the final criteria. Results: 145 studies were included in the current review. Four core themes were identified: virtues-based ethics education, competency-based ethics education, professionalism, and mutual safety. Results indicated that competency-based ethics education was the area most frequently discussed in the publications ( Conclusion: Medical ethics education plays an important role in clinical practice and moral decision-making. This review highlights the need for a standardized, multidimensional approach to understand the emerging trends of healthcare professions' ethics education, which will be helpful for AI education in medical ethics education in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.