Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41924676›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Morphometric Variations of Extraocular Muscles in a Caucasian Cohort: A Pilot Study on the Surgical Implications of Ethnic Diversity.

Vinesh Mistry, Naila Ali, Karuna Katti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vinesh MistryMedicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, GBR.
Naila AliMedicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, GBR.
Karuna KattiMedicine, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precise anatomical knowledge of the extraocular muscles (EOMs) is crucial, particularly for managing "slipped" or "lost" muscles in strabismus surgery. This pilot study provides the first morphometric data for Caucasian-specific, cadaveric orbits, revealing significant deviations from accepted anatomical norms. 6 Caucasian, formalin-embalmed orbits (86-92 years) were dissected using a superior orbitotomy approach at the Human Anatomy Unit, University of Birmingham. Recti and oblique lengths, insertion widths, limbal distances, and inter-recti distances were measured using a triple-observer, string-arc technique to account for scleral curvature. Data on muscle length, width, and limbal distance were compared with Thai, Mexican, Indian, and Taiwanese datasets using Welch's t-tests; inter-recti spacing was assessed observationally. Significant deviations were observed across all assessed parameters, most notably in relation to the Spiral of Tillaux, with an ascending limbal distance order of lateral rectus (LR) < medial rectus (MR) < inferior rectus (IR) < superior rectus (SR). Relative to the compared East Asian cohorts, the Caucasian population exhibited significantly more posterior insertions in three of the four recti muscles (P < 0.05). Inter-recti distance comparison identified the IR-MR gap as consistently the narrowest surgical corridor. Morphometric data of the EOMs including the possible inter-ethnic differences suggested in this study, should be further established through additional research. Moreover, further studies are needed to validate the use of inter-recti distance as a useful surgical morphometric parameter that could guide more precise and tailored approaches in strabismus surgery.

Indexed as

capturing accurate race and ethnicity dataclinical and functional anatomyextraocular muscleseye surgery‏strabismusstrabismus surgery

Identifiers

PMID41924676
PMCPMC13036573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.