Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41924545›Full record

ArticleTransportation research record2024

Using Twitter to Gauge Customer Satisfaction Response to a Major Transit Service Change in Calgary, Canada.

Rami Al-Sahar, Willem Klumpenhouwer, Amer Shalaby, Tamer El-Diraby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transportation research record, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rami Al-SaharDepartment of Civil and Mineral Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7952-2060
Willem KlumpenhouwerDepartment of Civil and Mineral Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4142-6409
Amer ShalabyDepartment of Civil and Mineral Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6137-9104
Tamer El-DirabyDepartment of Civil and Mineral Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6446-9199

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring public opinion about the quality of transit services is a key factor in understanding and addressing customer dissatisfaction and increasing customer loyalty and ridership. Sentiment analysis using social media-in particular Twitter-is a relatively cheap and potentially powerful complement to traditional survey methods, which are expensive and limited in sample size. This study aims to evaluate customer response to the introduction of Calgary Transit's MAX routes. We compared customer satisfaction expressed on Twitter with measured service reliability in the form of on-time performance. We also employed a qualitative research approach using content analysis from Twitter to gauge rider satisfaction over several service attributes before and after the service change. A transit-specific sentiment lexicon was developed to support this study using a hybrid approach. This lexicon outperformed generic sentiment lexicons traditionally used in transit studies with regard to both accuracy (18.4%) and F1-score (7.1%). We found that the overall perception of on-time performance from riders using Twitter was similar to the actual performance in the field. This was also observed for one individual route on which stops with poor schedule adherence were linked with negative feedback. This study concludes that combining customer-oriented measures from Twitter with operational-oriented ones would enable transit agencies to make better-informed decisions for planning and operational purposes.

Indexed as

customer satisfactionon-time performancepublic transitsentiment analysissentiment lexiconservice changeTwitter

Identifiers

PMID41924545
PMCPMC13038175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.