ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry2026
Attitudes of psychiatrists and caregivers towards covert medication administration in India: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Covert medication in India-Revisiting practice in the light of Mental Healthcare Act (MHCA) 2017.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To assess attitudes of Indian psychiatrists and caregivers toward covert medications (CM) and evaluate the reliability of the Staff and Caregivers Attitude towards Covert Medication Scale (SCACMS) in an Indian context. Materials and Methods: This exploratory cross-sectional study, conducted at Krishna Rajendra Hospital, Mysuru, India, administered the 15-item SCACMS to 90 psychiatrists across India and 90 caregivers from Mysuru. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, Cronbach's alpha, and Cohen's Kappa. Results: Both groups attributed CM use to limited resources and security issues, deeming it appropriate for aggressive patients or those lacking insight. Non-compliance was the primary reason for CM (89%). Patient awareness of CM led to anger in 58% of cases, while 89% improved with CM. The SCACMS showed satisfactory reliability among staff (alpha = 0.75) but less among caregivers (alpha = 0.45). Psychiatrists showed less support for CM compared to caregivers. Conclusion: While psychiatrists and caregivers recognize CM's utility in specific cases, particularly due to resource scarcity and security concerns, staff show less support for the practice. Findings suggest a need for standardized CM procedures in Indian mental health settings, improved resources, and staff training to potentially reduce CM reliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.