ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026
Multi-omics insights into triticale silage as a sustainable alternative to corn silage in heifer diets.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intensive ruminant production systems rely heavily on corn silage (CS) as a primary forage source; however, its resource-intensive cultivation and environmental constraints necessitate the development of sustainable alternatives. Methods: In a 90-day feeding trial, 24 growing heifers were assigned to diets in which CS was replaced by triticale silage (TS) at 0, 25, 50%, or 100% (DM basis). Growth performance, rumen fermentation, ruminal fatty acid (FA) profiles, and integrated rumen microbiome-metabolome interactions were evaluated. Results: A 25% substitution (TS25) as the optimal level, maintaining growth performance comparable to the control while achieving the lowest feed cost of gain. TS25 improved rumen fermentation (lower A: P and high total VFA), promoted more efficient nitrogen utilization (higher MCP with lower ammonia N), and enriched functionally relevant bacteria associated with fiber degradation and fermentation (e.g., Conclusion: Partial replacement of CS with TS at 25% provides a practical, data-supported strategy to improve economic efficiency while maintaining productivity and promoting favorable rumen microbial-metabolic features. This feeding approach may be applicable in water-limited or double-cropping regions, where TS can enhance forage system sustainability without compromising heifer growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.