ReviewJournal of emergencies, trauma, and shock
From Training to Practice: Addressing the Realities of Critical Care Subspecialty in Rural India.
Review in Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Critical care medicine in India has witnessed significant progress over the past two decades, with the establishment of structured training programs creating a cadre of trained intensivists. Despite these advancements, the translation of progress into rural health systems remains limited, and a large proportion of India's rural population continues to face inequities in access to quality intensive care. This review evaluates the status, challenges, and potential solutions related to the deployment and retention of trained intensivists in peripheral settings to inform equitable and sustainable healthcare policy reforms. Evidence was synthesized from peer-reviewed literature, government reports, and professional society guidelines, focusing on rural-urban disparities, workforce distribution gaps, training limitations, regulatory landscapes, and professional challenges. The findings highlight stark differences in the distribution of intensive care unit beds and availability of qualified intensivists, with rural and semiurban areas frequently under-resourced compared to well-equipped urban centers. Shortages also extend to trained nursing staff and ancillary health professionals, compounding the inequities. Intensivists face systemic hurdles, including inadequate professional recognition, poor access to mental health support, and limited exposure to interdisciplinary training, hospital administration, and research skills during formal training. Professional burnout and brain drain further weaken rural deployment. To bridge these gaps, this review emphasizes the need for targeted policy interventions that address infrastructure investment, workforce development, regulatory reforms, and professional support systems. Leveraging technology for telecritical care and ensuring recognition of intensivists as core specialists are essential steps toward achieving universal and equitable access to critical care across India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.