ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2026
Safety and Outcomes of Rapid Drug Desensitization to Various Biologic Agents: A Multidisciplinary Experience.
Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hypersensitivity Reactions to Biologics: Advances in Diagnosis and Management.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Biologic agents are widely used in clinical practice, but hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) may limit their use. Rapid drug desensitization (RDD) allows patients to safely continue essential therapy by inducing temporary tolerance, but evidence on newer biologics such as daratumumab, brentuximab vedotin, and pertuzumab remains scarce. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 11 patients who underwent RDD for biologic-induced HSRs between 2020 and 2024 at a tertiary allergy center. Each protocol was jointly designed by an experienced allergist and clinical pharmacist and carried out in the intensive care unit under close nurse and physician supervision. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data, reaction grades, skin test results, premedication regimens, and breakthrough reactions (BTRs) were analyzed. Results: A total of 43 RDD cycles were performed for rituximab (n = 18), brentuximab vedotin (n = 13), daratumumab (n = 9), and pertuzumab (n = 3). Six patients underwent skin testing, two with positive results. Four patients (36%) experienced only mild cutaneous BTRs during their first RDD cycle, and no severe events occurred. The overall BTR rate per cycle was 9.3%. Extending premedication to more than 24 hours before desensitization reduced BTR frequency from 17% to 4%. Conclusion: RDD proved to be a safe and effective approach for managing HSRs to both common and less frequently used biologic agents. All patients completed treatment without discontinuation. Extended premedication period, multidisciplinary planning, and intensive care unit-based monitoring appear to enhance procedural safety and support the broader implementation of RDD in clinical allergy practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.