Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41924419›Full record

ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026

Systematic Review of the Intraoperative Hypothermia Risk Prediction Models in Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients.

Huiting Xu, Yan Zhou, Xu Li, Hailing Ju

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Huiting Xu *School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0007-8736-1018
Yan Zhou *Department of Operating Room, QingPu Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xu LiSchool of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0000-7576-8741
Hailing JuDepartment of Nursing; Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Machine learning (ML) identifies risk factors for intraoperative hypothermia (IH) more comprehensively than traditional scoring systems, offering effective guidance for nursing care. Despite promising results in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients-a high-incidence group-the quality of existing ML models requires systematic evaluation. This study reviews IH risk prediction models in TJA, focusing on their development quality and predictive performance. Purpose: This study aims systematically review and evaluate intraoperative hypothermia risk prediction models in TJA patients. Patients and Methods: A systematic search was conducted across nine databases (including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, Wan fang database, CNKI, VIP database, and SinoMed) from inception to October 2025. Two independent reviewers performed the literature screening and data extraction, utilizing the PROBAST tool to assess study quality. Results: Eight studies were included, all involving model development and internal validation; four also performed external validation. Algorithms used were primarily Logistic regression (7 studies) and Random Forest (1 study). All models demonstrated good calibration and strong discriminatory ability, with the Area Under the Curve (AUC) values rangng from 0.791 to 0.938. Key predictors identified across studies include patient factors (age, BMI, hemoglobin level, ASA classification), surgical factors (duration, fluid/irrigation volume, blood loss, operating room temperature), and anesthesia factors (duration, active warming). Conclusion: IH risk prediction models for TJA patients demonstrate high performance and clinical applicability, with consistent predictors identified across the literature. However, the included studies exhibited a relatively high risk of bias. Future research should ensure high-quality data handling and standardization of validation processes. Prospective, multicenter studies are needed to refine these models, thereby providing clearer guidance for clinical decision-making. With the advancement of artificial intelligence, integrating current predictive models into visualized clinical tools will facilitate nursing decisions and reduce the incidence of intraoperative hypothermia in TJA patients. Prospero Registration Number: CRD420251134154.

Indexed as

intraoperative hypothermiaoperating room nursingprediction modelsystematic reviewtotal joint arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID41924419
PMCPMC13037634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.