ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Systematic Review of the Intraoperative Hypothermia Risk Prediction Models in Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Machine learning (ML) identifies risk factors for intraoperative hypothermia (IH) more comprehensively than traditional scoring systems, offering effective guidance for nursing care. Despite promising results in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients-a high-incidence group-the quality of existing ML models requires systematic evaluation. This study reviews IH risk prediction models in TJA, focusing on their development quality and predictive performance. Purpose: This study aims systematically review and evaluate intraoperative hypothermia risk prediction models in TJA patients. Patients and Methods: A systematic search was conducted across nine databases (including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, Wan fang database, CNKI, VIP database, and SinoMed) from inception to October 2025. Two independent reviewers performed the literature screening and data extraction, utilizing the PROBAST tool to assess study quality. Results: Eight studies were included, all involving model development and internal validation; four also performed external validation. Algorithms used were primarily Logistic regression (7 studies) and Random Forest (1 study). All models demonstrated good calibration and strong discriminatory ability, with the Area Under the Curve (AUC) values rangng from 0.791 to 0.938. Key predictors identified across studies include patient factors (age, BMI, hemoglobin level, ASA classification), surgical factors (duration, fluid/irrigation volume, blood loss, operating room temperature), and anesthesia factors (duration, active warming). Conclusion: IH risk prediction models for TJA patients demonstrate high performance and clinical applicability, with consistent predictors identified across the literature. However, the included studies exhibited a relatively high risk of bias. Future research should ensure high-quality data handling and standardization of validation processes. Prospective, multicenter studies are needed to refine these models, thereby providing clearer guidance for clinical decision-making. With the advancement of artificial intelligence, integrating current predictive models into visualized clinical tools will facilitate nursing decisions and reduce the incidence of intraoperative hypothermia in TJA patients. Prospero Registration Number: CRD420251134154.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.