ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2026
Enhanced diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy: integrating advanced algorithms for automated detection and classification.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo develop an automated diagnostic system for early detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR) using fundus images by identifying exudates, hemorrhages, and microaneurysms with advanced image processing and machine learning techniques.
methodsFundus images from the IDRiD dataset and additional Kaggle datasets were used. A wavelet-based band-pass filter was applied for edge enhancement of retinal features. Gaussian mixture model (GMM) clustering was used to segment and extract texture features. These extracted features were classified using machine learning algorithms, including a random forest classifier and a multilayer perceptron neural network. Performance metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were computed to evaluate the proposed model's diagnostic effectiveness.
resultsThe random forest-based classification system achieved a sensitivity of 95.08%, specificity of 86.67%, and overall accuracy of 95.20% in detecting DR lesions. The combination of wavelet-based edge enhancement, GMM clustering, and neural network-based feature classification demonstrated high reliability in lesion identification.
conclusionThe proposed method effectively detects early signs of DR from fundus images, offering a high-accuracy, automated, and scalable solution for assisting ophthalmologists. Its application can support large-scale screening programs, particularly in regions with limited access to specialized eye care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.