ReviewFrontiers in radiology2026
Quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging across PET, SPECT, CMR, and CT.
Review in Frontiers in radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond Stenosis: Mechanism-Based Multimodality Imaging and Invasive Coronary Function Testing for Endotype Definition in ANOCA/INOCA.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent clinical trials demonstrating the prognostic value of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), and the limited incremental prognostic benefit of ischemia-guided revascularization over optimal medical therapy, have shifted focus away from functional testing. Nevertheless, myocardial perfusion assessment remains essential in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), microvascular dysfunction, ischemia with normal coronary arteries (INOCA), coronary anomalies, and cardiomyopathies. Advances in positron emission tomography (PET), cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), and computed tomography (CT) now enable absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF), providing improved diagnostic and prognostic performance and underscoring the need to reappraise myocardial perfusion imaging. This mini-review summarizes key physiological principles, contemporary acquisition and post-processing strategies, and the clinical relevance of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) across PET, Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT), CMR, and CT, and discusses future perspectives in quantitative MPI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.