ArticleJournal of family violence2026
Examining Associations Between Intimate Partner Violence-Related Brain Injury, Psychological Abuse, and Cognitive Functioning in Community Women.
Article in Journal of family violence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Intimate partner violence (IPV) has been associated with adverse physical, psychological, and cognitive consequences in women. Long-term effects of IPV on cognitive functioning are not well understood. We studied cognitive functioning of community-residing women who experienced physical and psychological IPV, on average eight and five years prior, respectively. Specifically, we investigated cognitive functioning in relation to both number of IPV-related mild brain injuries (BIs) and psychological abuse severity. Methods: In a sample of 97 community dwelling women (age 19-69, mean = 39), we assessed Reaction Time, Verbal Memory, Visual Memory, Processing Speed, and Executive Function using the Central Nervous System Vital Signs computerized neuropsychological test battery; lifetime psychological abuse severity using a modified Revised Conflict Tactics Scale 2; and IPV and non-IPV related BIs using the Ohio State University Traumatic BI Identification Method and the BI Severity Assessment. Results: Women obtained lower scores than expected, given their level of education, on the Reaction Time, Verbal Memory, and the Executive Function domain scores, approximately one-third to two-thirds of a standard deviation below the normative means for the general population. 61% of our sample (59/97) reported at least one IPV-related BI. A greater number of IPV-related mild BIs was associated with lower Visual Memory scores, with a small effect size, but no other cognitive domain scores. Psychological abuse severity had a linear association with higher Reaction Time scores (indicating faster and more accurate responses). Psychological abuse severity had a quadratic inverted-U relationship with Verbal Memory scores indicating initially higher scores, but with greater abuse severity lower scores on the verbal memory test. Conclusions: Some of the women in the community who experienced physical and psychological IPV years ago obtained cognitive test scores that were lower than expected. There was a weak association between a greater number of IPV-related mild BIs and a measure of visual memory. Unexpectedly, we found that greater psychological abuse severity was associated with faster complex reaction time. Also, at high severity of psychological abuse, women tended to score worse on a measure of verbal recognition memory. These results should be interpreted with caution until replicated in other samples. Future studies using larger sample sizes and longitudinal study designs are needed to better understand the mechanisms by which experiencing psychological abuse is associated with future cognitive functioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.